NCSF on TwitterSubscribe to the NCSF RSS FeedNCSF Blog

NCSF Headlines

Guest Blog: What Therapists Need to Know About Consensual Non-monogamy

on Thursday, 27 September 2018. Posted in Front Page Headline, NCSF News

By Heath Schechinger, Ph.D.

Too many clients who are in consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationships have to educate their therapists. Too many of them discontinue therapy because their therapist judged them, didn’t know enough about CNM to be helpful, or worse, makes actively stigmatizing comments such as “polyamory isn’t stable,” “women can’t do non-monogamy,” or “we can’t accept you to our therapy group as you’re non-monogamous — you wouldn’t fit in.” These are real quotes from a study about the experiences of CNM clients in therapy a couple of colleagues and I recently had accepted for publication in Journal for Clinical and Consulting Psychology.

We believe our results clearly highlight how we need to start taking the mental health needs of the CNM community seriously. For context, around 4–5% of people in the United States report that they are in CNM relationships, a comparable number to how many people identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender. More than one in five adults have also tried CNM at some point, which is not far off from how many people own a cat. We also know that interest and awareness of CNM, especially open relationships and polyamory, is on the rise, despite evidence of blatant stigma directed toward this population.

It is still rare, however, for mental and medical health professionals to receive training on how to effectively support people who are engaging in or exploring consensual non-monogamy. Given what we know about minority stress causing additional mental health burdens, I am concerned about the lack of support this community is receiving.

As co-chair of the American Psychological Association’s Division 44 Consensual Non-monogamy Task Force, I’m calling for my colleagues to thoughtfully examine our assumptions around monogamy, pursue and promote education about relationship diversity, and approach this issue with the same level of respect and care that we do with other marginalized communities.

Results, Implications, and Calls to Action

In our study, Drs. John Sakaluk, Amy Moors, and I asked 249 people engaged in CNM about their experiences in therapy, making it the largest study to date on this topic. Significantly, the study was accepted at a top-tier, mainstream clinical journal, signaling that the field of psychology is starting to recognize the importance of addressing relationship diversity.

Monogamy is privileged. It is the unquestioned status quo, prompting many therapists to assume by default that their clients are monogamous, or even, for some, that their clients should be. The publication of this paper means that mainstream psychologists may read about and subsequently treat the needs of the consensual non-monogamy community with an elevated level of respect. The article also calls on mental health researchers and providers to examine our biases and take a nonjudgemental posture toward clients engaged in consensual non-monogamy — just as we would with LGBTQ clients.

We asked participants in structured and open formats what their therapist did (or did not do) that they found to be helpful and unhelpful, allowing us to generate broad and specific practice recommendations and calls to action.

Educating Therapists

One of the most prominent themes in our data was the importance of educating therapists about CNM. For example, our participants rated therapists as being more helpful when their therapists: (1) educated themselves about CNM issues; (2) held affirming, nonjudgmental attitudes toward CNM; (3) helped them feel good about being CNM; and (4) were open to discussing issues related to a client’s relationship structure. By contrast, CNM clients rated therapists as less helpful and were more likely to prematurely discontinue therapy when their therapist: (1) lacked or refused to gather information about CNM, (2) held judgmental, (3) pathologizing, and/or (4) dismissive attitudes toward CNM.

One-fifth of our participants also reported that their therapist lacked the basic knowledge of consensual non-monogamy issues necessary to be an effective therapist, and/or had to be constantly educated about CNM issues.

That is not to say all therapists were unaware of CNM. One-third of therapists in our study were described by CNM clients as quite knowledgeable of CNM communities and resources. We also asked in an open format what our participants’ therapists did that they found particularly unhelpful. One in five of those responding mentioned their therapist lacking or refusing to gather info about CNM.

It is important to note that our results may be inflated positively as nearly half of our participants reported intentionally seeking a therapist who was affirming toward CNM. Results were generally worse among those who did not search for a CNM-affirming therapist.

These results in conjunction with the size and stigma directed toward the CNM population has led me to conclude that educating therapists needs to be addressed at the highest levels of the mental health profession. It is time to include CNM in therapist training and continuing education programs, and I am calling on my colleagues to join me in advocating for this change.

Removing Barriers to Treatment

Being able to find a therapist who is educated and affirming of CNM is also a critical issue. CNM therapy clients who screened for a CNM-affirming therapist reported better treatment outcomes. They experienced more “exemplary” and fewer “inappropriate” therapy practices by their therapists, and they rated their therapists as being more helpful than those who did not search for a CNM-affirming therapist.

I am also requesting my colleagues advocate for CNM to be included as a search term on therapist locator websites (such as Psychology Today and APA Psychologist Locator) to help remove barriers to the CNM community accessing culturally competent care.

This is a step that I am pleased to announce that APA Psychologist Locator has agreed to take. We are currently in dialog with them about adding ‘Consensual Non-monogamy’ and ‘Kink/Diverse Sexualities’ as searchable categories, with the changes (hopefully) set to go live in November/December 2018. We hope Psychology Today and other therapist locators will follow suit. …

Resources & Getting Involved

One of our initiatives is to advocate for the eventual creation of practice guidelines, similar to those that were created by the American Psychological Association for working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual therapy clients as well as transgender and gender nonconforming therapy clients.

In an effort to progress toward practice guidelines, I developed empirically-informed benchmarks that can be used to assess practices at the institutional and individual levels. Dr. Michelle Vaughan also led the charge in creating informational brochures that people engaged in CNM can provide to their medical and mental health provider(s).

You can access the benchmarking tool, language for asking about relationship style on demographic forms, informational brochures, and join the APA Division 44 Consensual Non-monogamy mailing list by signing our petition to support relationship diversity in mental health, medical health, and the legal profession. Alternatively, you can receive these resources by simply joining the mailing list.

In addition to signing our petition and/or joining our mailing list, we would like to invite you apply to join our task force or follow us on Facebook and Twitter, where we will be posting updates. I will also be making updates on my Twitter, Facebook, and Linkedin accounts.

These resources and this post can be shared freely with your network as well as your current medical and mental health providers.

Educating therapists, removing barriers to accessing treatment, asking about relationship status on demographic forms, setting benchmarks, and signing petitions will not eliminate the judgment and discrimination experienced by the CNM community — but we believe these are all important steps forward. With education and exposure we can challenge the mononormative assumptions promoting a one-size-fits all model of relating — in the same way we challenge assumptions about sexual orientation and gender diversity.

Just as monogamy is not right for everyone, neither is consensual non-monogamy. It’s not about what’s right for all, but what’s right sized for the individual.

 

Heath Schechinger, Ph.D., is a licensed counseling psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and Co-chair of the American Psychological Association Division 44 Consensual Non-monogamy Task Force. His private practice specializes in providing support to the CNM, kink, queer, and gender non-conforming communities.

Comments (11)

  • die man lesen oder weglassen muss

    10 November 2018 at 04:47 |
    Was ist Findet icch bin neuu in diesem, stieß
    ich auf diese Ich hab entdeckte Es positiv nützlich uund
    es hat dazu beigetragen, gestützte mich Lasten. Icch hoffe bis geben einen Beitrag & Hilfe andere
    Benutzer wie ihree geholfen me. Goood Arbeit.

    reply

  • kongyaji4s.net

    11 November 2018 at 03:08 |
    Du hast gemacht einige anständige Punkte gibt.
    Ich sah prüft iim Internet erfahren Sie mehr über
    das Thema und fand die meisten Menshen wird gehen zusammen mit Ihren Ansichten über diesee Website.

    reply

  • Gdxdtzx.Com

    14 November 2018 at 21:28 |
    Ahaa, seihe schön Unterhaltung Impressum Absatz hier an diessm Blog, Ich habe alle, die so gelese jetzt mich auch zuu kommentieren an dieser
    Stelle.

    reply

  • wmql888.com

    16 November 2018 at 20:11 |
    Hallo Es wurde gerade bewusst Blog über Googlle unnd fand, dass es
    ees ist wirklich wirklich informativ. Ich wirst aufpassen Brüssel.

    Ichh werde dankbar, wenn Sie weiterhin diese künftig. Zahlreiche Menschen werden von Ihrem Schrdeiben profitiert werden. Cheers!

    reply

  • Was ich üBer Finanzen weiß

    08 December 2018 at 00:15 |
    ich ernsthaft Ihre Website .. Sehr schön Farben und Thema.
    Haben Sie Entwicklung diesse Seitte sich selbst?
    Bitte antworten Sie mir zurück, als ich mich auf wollen erstelllen meine persönliche Webseite und wollen lernen, wo Sie habe diese von oder genau, waas der.
    Dank!

    reply

  • Ashlee

    31 December 2018 at 16:59 |
    Grüße aus Idaho Baden-Württemberg! Ich bin langweilig bei der Arbeit, so habe icch
    beschlossen, Von A blog auf meinem iPhone in der
    Mittagspause. I genießen der Informationen Siee bieten hier und kann
    nicht warten, umm eien Blick zu nehmen, wenn ich nach Hauhse komme.
    Ich bin schockiert überrascht, wie schneell schnelle
    Blogg auf meiner geladen Haandy .. Icch bin nicht einmal mmit WIFI,
    nur 3G .. Immerhin superb Website!

    reply

  • Harris

    04 January 2019 at 19:12 |
    Ich liebe, waas euch Regel. Diese Art der Berichterstattung!

    Halten Sie sich diie hervorragende wunderbaren funktioniert
    Jungs Ich habe eingebaut eufh zu medin eigenes Blogroll.

    reply

  • Jeanett

    05 January 2019 at 08:32 |
    Seine , wie Sie lernen thoughts! Sie erscheien wissen eine Menge rund, wie Sie der E-Book in ihr oder so
    etwas. Ich glaube, dass Sie , dass man einfach konntte tun mit wenige % bis Antrieeb die Meldung home ein wenig,
    jedoch statt dass das ist wunderbaren Blog. Eine fantastische
    lesen. Ich werde auf jeden Fall sicherlich wiederkommen.

    reply

  • Earle

    06 February 2019 at 00:37 |
    Ahaa, seine schön Untergaltung zum Therma Absatz an dieser Steloe ann diese weblog,
    Ich habe alle, ddie so gelesen jetzt mih auch zuu kommetieren hier.

    reply

  • perfect wine

    03 March 2019 at 07:33 |
    The next time I read a blog, Hopefully it does not disappoint me just as much
    as this one. After all, Yes, it was my choice to read, however I truly believed you would have something interesting to talk about.
    All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix
    if you were not too busy looking for attention.

    reply

  • Jeffrey

    09 March 2019 at 13:53 |
    Es ist sehr mühe, jedxe herauszufinden Angelegenhheit um net gegenüber Schulbücher, wiie iich fand diese Absatz an diesem website.

    reply

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest. Optional login below.